Deadline clarity
See trigger dates, deadlines and days remaining at a glance.
Loading ContractingClaims
Loading ContractingClaims
ContractingClaimsContractingClaims guides project teams from the first delay event to a review-ready notice, claim and evidence trail.
Delay event
Notice deadline
22 Apr 2026
Days claimed
10 days
Evidence files
4 linked
Analysis review
Ready for reviewConfirm when revised design information was required before issuing the notice.
Important claims work is too often split across email chains, spreadsheets and old templates. ContractingClaims creates one structured record from event to issued document.
See trigger dates, deadlines and days remaining at a glance.
Surface missing facts, risk flags and relevant clause records.
Keep delay notices, EoT claims and L&E notices consistent.
Preserve evidence, document versions and a clear audit history.
Capture the site facts, trigger dates, affected works, mitigation and supporting evidence.
Check notice compliance, missing facts, contract clauses and commercial risk before drafting.
Generate coordinated notices and claims, preserve every version and track the next action.
The platform asks for site facts first, keeps assumptions visible, and makes professional review a required part of the workflow.
Choose the annual plan that fits your project portfolio. Upgrade through secure Stripe billing as your team grows.
Sole
Freelance QS, sole trader or very small contractor
£1,500/year
Billed annually
Team
Small contractor or quantity surveying team
£3,000/year
Billed annually
Company
SME or mid-tier contractor
£7,500/year
Billed annually
Enterprise
Multi-office contractor, consultancy or group company
From £15,000/year
Billed annually
A practical claims workflow, with professional review kept firmly in the loop.
No. It helps teams organise facts, identify missing information and prepare consistent drafts. Every analysis and document must be reviewed by a suitably qualified professional.
The platform supports JCT, NEC and FIDIC workflows according to your plan. It only uses clause records supplied to the workspace and never invents contract wording.
OpenAI and Anthropic independently review the structured event record. ContractingClaims reconciles both results conservatively, keeps assumptions visible and falls back to either provider if the other is unavailable.
Yes. Company plans can add correspondence details and a logo to generated documents, request approvals and preserve every issued or revised version.
No. Workspace data is isolated by organisation using Supabase row-level security, and provider keys remain on the private Railway API service.
Set up your first project, capture a delay event and build a structured notice record.
Create your account