Add the PDFs, emails, photographs, programmes, notes and cost records your team already has. See the facts, missing evidence and next steps clearly, then prepare an editable, source-linked document for professional review.
Delay event
Evidence connected
Site diary, revised drawings, programme and correspondence in one record.
One fact to confirm
When was the revised information required? Confirm the date before issuing a notice.
A draft you can review
Source references and open questions stay visible in the editable notice.
Open the sample claim01
Add what you have
Bring in evidence, correspondence, notes and project records.
02
See what matters
Review the facts, deadlines, contradictions and missing proof.
03
Prepare the next step
Create a clear claim, notice, report or submission pack.
You do not need a perfect case file or a finished argument to begin. Choose the situation that feels closest and we will show you a useful first step.
Important claims work is too often split across email chains, spreadsheets and old templates. ContractingClaims creates one structured record from event to issued document.
See trigger dates, deadlines and days remaining at a glance.
Surface missing facts, risk flags and relevant clause records.
Keep delay notices, EoT claims and L&E notices consistent.
Preserve evidence, document versions and a clear audit history.
Capture the site facts, trigger dates, affected works, mitigation and supporting evidence.
Check notice compliance, missing facts, contract clauses and commercial risk before drafting.
Generate coordinated notices and claims, preserve every version and track the next action.
ContractingClaims helps commercial teams prepare evidence-led construction claim records for delay notices, extension of time claims, loss and expense notices and client-ready submission packs.
Inspect the sample outputEvery output is structured for review, editing and export. Material statements stay linked to the selected evidence, while gaps and assumptions remain visible before the document is issued.
Document preview
Late issue of coordinated design information
Executive summary
The event, entitlement position and requested outcome.
Chronology and causation
Dated facts linked to the project record and programme evidence.
Evidence schedule
Source references, page locators and supporting excerpts.
Gaps and reservations
Missing proof and assumptions that require professional review.
ContractingClaims combines private storage, organisation-level access controls and a visible audit trail. It supports commercial and claims professionals; it does not replace legal advice or professional judgement.
Files are kept in private storage and opened through short-lived signed access links.
Row-level access rules and membership checks keep each company workspace separate.
Sources, assumptions, versions, approvals and actions stay connected in the audit record.
Drafts clearly flag uncertainty and remain subject to professional human review before issue.
Customer reviews
Read customer feedback published on SaaS Browser, or share your own experience.
Feedback from SaaS Browser
Open independently published customer reviews. The review panel connects to SaaS Browser when you choose to load it.
These are separate subscription types, not a monthly-versus-yearly discount toggle. New monthly plans have a defined usage allowance and a seven-month minimum term; annual plans remove the AI credit limit while retaining each plan's user, project and feature limits.
Sole
Freelance QS, sole trader or very small contractor
£99/month
7-month minimum term
Team
Small contractor or quantity surveying team
£149/month
7-month minimum term
Company
SME or mid-tier contractor
£299/month
7-month minimum term
Sole
Freelance QS, sole trader or very small contractor
£2,400/year
Equivalent to £200/month
Team
Small contractor or quantity surveying team
£4,800/year
Equivalent to £400/month
Company
SME or mid-tier contractor
£12,000/year
Equivalent to £1,000/month
Need custom governance, onboarding or API capacity?
Compare every plan featureA practical claims workflow, with professional review kept firmly in the loop.
Yes. The public sample claim pack shows an anonymised chronology, source references, evidence schedule, gaps and review checklist. Viewing it does not require an account or payment card.
No. It helps teams organise facts, identify missing information and prepare consistent drafts. Every analysis and document must be reviewed by a suitably qualified professional.
Yes. Project teams can upload the basic records, organise the chronology and prepare a working case file. An experienced, authorised reviewer should then check the facts, contract route, notice timing, evidence and final wording before issue.
Yes. Upload the draft with its supporting records to stress-test the position, locate additional support, surface contradictions and identify missing proof. It remains a second pair of eyes, not a substitute for professional judgement.
The platform supports JCT, NEC and FIDIC workflows according to your plan. It only uses clause records supplied to the workspace and never invents contract wording.
Independent review passes assess the structured event record. ContractingClaims reconciles the results conservatively, keeps assumptions visible and continues safely if one review pass is temporarily unavailable.
Yes. Company plans can add correspondence details and a logo to generated documents, request approvals and preserve every issued or revised version.
No. Workspace data is isolated by organisation using Supabase row-level security, and provider keys remain on the private Railway API service.
Your projects, sources and documents remain available. You can wait for the next metered-monthly allowance, move to a larger metered plan, or change to an unlimited annual subscription.
New metered monthly subscriptions have a seven-month minimum commitment and are billed monthly. You can schedule cancellation at any time for the commitment end; after that date the plan continues month to month until cancelled. Annual subscriptions renew yearly. Applicable taxes are shown before payment confirmation.
Uploaded evidence is private by default. Access is checked against company membership, files are delivered through expiring signed links, and administrative actions are audited.
The anonymised sample shows exactly how project records become a chronology, source-linked draft and review checklist. No account or payment card is needed to view it.
